Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Semin Cancer Biol ; 84: 255-262, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34129914

RESUMO

RATIONALE: In 2016, Belgium launched the Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Roadbook, consisting in 10 Actions, across the health care system, to facilitate the uptake of NGS in routine clinical practice. We compiled feedback on deployment of the NGS Roadbook from governmental stakeholders and beneficiaries: health policy makers, insurance providers, pathologists, geneticists, and oncologists. MAIN FINDINGS: The Roadbook ensured the establishment of a Commission on Personalized Medicine and NGS testing guidelines. A national benchmarking trial ensued, and 10 networks of hospitals and laboratories adopted a reimbursement convention with the Belgian Health Insurance Agency. The Healthdata.be platform centralizes the collection of NGS metrics, and citizens were consulted on their views about NGS and genomics. CONCLUSION: The Roadbook facilitated the implementation of NGS in routine (hemato-)oncology care in Belgium. Some challenges remain linked to data sharing and access by a wider range of stakeholders. Next steps include continuous monitoring of health outcomes and the budgetary impact.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Medicina de Precisão , Bélgica , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Humanos , Oncologia , Neoplasias/genética , Neoplasias/terapia
3.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 46(1): 19-28, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28403953

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To investigate risk factors of total, spontaneous and induced preterm birth in 2010 and differences between 1995 and 2010. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The national perinatal surveys are based on a representative sample of births in France. We selected live-born singletons (n=14,326 in 2010 and 12,885 in 1995) and used multiple regression analyses to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for maternal sociodemographic characteristics, obstetric history, prenatal care and smoking. RESULTS: The main risk factors in 2010 were parity 1 compared to parity 2 (aOR=1.9 [95% CI 1.5-1.3]), previous preterm delivery (aOR=6.6 [5.0-8.7]), pre-pregnancy body mass index<18.5 compared to 18.5-24.9kg/m2 (aOR=1.7 [1.4-2.2]), level of education completed: high school or less, inadequate prenatal care and cannabis use. Most risk factors of spontaneous and induced preterm births were similar. Compared to 1995, maternal age≥35 years and previous induced abortion were no longer associated with preterm birth in 2010. CONCLUSION: Identified risk factors for preterm birth in France in 2010 agree with the literature. Increases in baseline rates for maternal age and medically induced abortions may explain changes in certain preterm birth risk factors.


Assuntos
Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Adulto , Índice de Massa Corporal , Escolaridade , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Uso da Maconha/efeitos adversos , Paridade , Gravidez , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Análise de Regressão , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
4.
BJOG ; 124(5): 785-794, 2017 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27613083

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Concerns about differences in registration practices across countries have limited the use of routine data for international very preterm birth (VPT) rate comparisons. DESIGN: Population-based study. SETTING: Twenty-seven European countries, the United States, Canada and Japan in 2010. POPULATION: A total of 9 376 252 singleton births. METHOD: We requested aggregated gestational age data on live births, stillbirths and terminations of pregnancy (TOP) before 32 weeks of gestation, and information on registration practices for these births. We compared VPT rates and assessed the impact of births at 22-23 weeks of gestation, and different criteria for inclusion of stillbirths and TOP on country rates and rankings. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Singleton very preterm birth rate, defined as singleton stillbirths and live births before 32 completed weeks of gestation per 1000 total births, excluding TOP if identifiable in the data source. RESULTS: Rates varied from 5.7 to 15.7 per 1000 total births and 4.0 to 11.9 per 1000 live births. Country registration practices were related to percentage of births at 22-23 weeks of gestation (between 1% and 23% of very preterm births) and stillbirths (between 6% and 40% of very preterm births). After excluding births at 22-23 weeks, rate variations remained high and with a few exceptions, country rankings were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: International comparisons of very preterm birth rates using routine data should exclude births at 22-23 weeks of gestation and terminations of pregnancy. The persistent large rate variations after these exclusions warrant continued surveillance of VPT rates at 24 weeks and over in high-income countries. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: International comparisons of VPT rates should exclude births at 22-23 weeks of gestation and terminations of pregnancy.


Assuntos
Coeficiente de Natalidade , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Canadá/epidemiologia , Países Desenvolvidos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Idade Gestacional , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Japão/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
Eur J Public Health ; 26(3): 422-30, 2016 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26891058

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: International comparisons of perinatal health indicators are complicated by the heterogeneity of data sources on pregnancy, maternal and neonatal outcomes. Record linkage can extend the range of data items available and thus can improve the validity and quality of routine data. We sought to assess the extent to which data are linked routinely for perinatal health research and reporting. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature by searching PubMed for perinatal health studies from 2001 to 2011 based on linkage of routine data (data collected continuously at various time intervals). We also surveyed European health monitoring professionals about use of linkage for national perinatal health surveillance. RESULTS: 516 studies fit our inclusion criteria. Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden, the US and the UK contributed 76% of the publications; a further 29 countries contributed at least one publication. Most studies linked vital statistics, hospital records, medical birth registries and cohort data. Other sources were specific registers for: cancer (70), congenital anomalies (56), ART (19), census (19), health professionals (37), insurance (22) prescription (31), and level of education (18). Eighteen of 29 countries (62%) reported linking data for routine perinatal health monitoring. CONCLUSION: Research using linkage is concentrated in a few countries and is not widely practiced in Europe. Broader adoption of data linkage could yield substantial gains for perinatal health research and surveillance.


Assuntos
Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde do Lactente/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Materna/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Perinatal/estatística & dados numéricos , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA